Free Essay - Democracy Sets Up Impossible Contradictions

Freedom was a political idea that emerged triumphant in the 20th century. When the republic was formed, the average richer than was beyond democracy had the chance to fight corruption (Posner n.p). More profoundly, freedom allows people to speak their minds to shape the future of their children and themselves. That is why many people worldwide risk the idea that democracy appeals on their behalf. However, capitalism had a theory that never allowed citizens to establish another political sense (Posner n.p). The most common one expressed was the constitution of the United States. This essay will argue that democracy had an outlined structure that brought contradictions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

In a constitutional democracy, the majorities have authority but are limited by institutional and legal means to the point that the rights of minorities and individuals are not respected. The framework is intended to help interested people in various countries improve or establish curricular programs that foster support and understanding for constitutional democracy (Wilentz n.p). The outline of this constitution was also created to adapt to the needs and circumstances of people's political communities.

The opening phrase of the constitution, "We the people....can establish this constitution," was created to send a message to the revolutionaries all over the world to allow everyone to establish their obligations and rights that could regulate their constitution and public life. The constitution also bound organizations that would facilitate supreme power over the citizens and the states (Wilentz n.p). But then a few problems emerged when developing the new constitution because people never wanted to subject themselves with political orders that would cover both their needs and that of the state.

The external constituent power, for example, was meant to draw the constitutional resources outside the territory and people of the political order or future state. However, it is still playing a role in the past to give legitimacy to the next state. This means that instead of it having a continual process that maintains the constitution, the foreign power intervention has a unique renewal and rupture of political relations that will make the future look like a turning point (Wilentz n.p). When constituent powers are compared between the past and the present, they look like they are operating at the origin or the beginning of the state even if the constituent power is external, internal or both.

In this sense, it is known that democracy has more difficulties as compared to the republic and legal ones. The legal paradox, for example, gets its powers from people to solve the issues brought by the democratic mystery (Waldstreicher n.p). Since its difficult to derive democracy from people, it has, in return, made similar claims that developed into severe issues because democracy has remained a political value and problem to the communities due to lack of solutions (Waldstreicher n.p). The question has also become unsolvable because it is unable to balance the rights of the individual with other rights since it focuses on amendments.

Conclusion

Democracy was a political idea that emerged successfully in the 20th century to fight corruption. However, it had a theory that never allowed citizens to establish another political notion. The external constituent power, for example, was meant to draw the constitutional resources outside the territory and people of the political order or future state. However, it is still playing a role in the past to give legitimacy to the next state. In this sense, it is known that democracy has more difficulties as compared to the republic and legal ones.

Works Cited

Posner, Eric. The U.S. Constitution Is Impossible to Amend. Blame the Founders. 5 May 2014, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/05/amending-the-constitution-is-much-too-hard-blame-the-founders.html.

Waldstreicher, David. "Yes, Virginia, the Constitution Was Pro-Slavery." The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 19 Sept. 2015, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/how-the-constitution-was-indeed-pro-slavery/406288/#about-the-authors.

Wilentz, Sean. "Constitutionally, Slavery Is No National Institution." The New York Times, The New York Times, 16 Sept. 2015, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/16/opinion/constitutionally-slavery-is-no-national-institution.html?mcubz=1.