Article Analysis Esay on Moment Work: Tectonic Theater Project's Process of Devising Theater

The article strives to create a play from historical events that happened in the past. The authors have collected the necessary materials and evidence from various cases to make the narration realistic and fascinating. The play is about an ancient ruler who was punished because of what was considered sin (Kaufman and McAdams 91). Lord Wilde was the main character in the story, and thus, the play was set to identify his offense. From the trial pieces of evidence collected, Wilde was accused of homosexuality tendencies, and he was a threat to society. The author selected some of the best actors, and one was chosen to play Wilde's character. Reconstructing a historical event is extremely significant since it brings people closer to portraying the real truth through the art of acting.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The author determined the trial was conducted in three different phases. In each, both the witnesses and the offender gave a different account of the story. The primary goal of the author was to compile all the three trials into one major reconstruction play. The writer ensured to collect every detail articulated on the tests and commenced acting on each scene. He selected the best actors to reconstruct this particular historical event. For each trial, the actors received their script and perfectly mastered their lines (Kaufman and McAdams 92). Each actor also ensured that they fit into the given character to mimic how the individual felt at the trial in all different phases. However, the author realized that uncovering the truth was an extreme journey because each investigation brought out a new finding. For instance, Wilde was accused of homosexuality, but Wilde never talks about his attraction to men during the whole trial or offers any suspicious description.

The author realized that by omitting some information, the actors might deliver an unrealistic play. He distributed his scripts for each actor to retain the same character from the three trials, master the lines, and, if possible, the included poems (Kaufman and McAdams 93). The writer ensured that he familiarized himself with every script before dispensing them to the panel of actors. The narrator soon provided that the play falls into place and aligns with every occurrence in the three trial phases. The strategy was beneficial since the writer analyzed information from the trial and included them in the script without forgetting any significant quote by the witnesses or the prosecuted. The author ensured that the dramatic reconstruction formed a fascinating moment without any major distractions.

The writer discerned that Oscar Wilde is tried three times, and most information from the trial was similar, hence forming strategies that would prevent repetition. He extracted the essential lines quoted by Oscar Wilde and the witnesses. The narrator ensured that he used the academic language, and the play mostly portrayed Wilde as an example of a fall from grace to grass after his three trials. The reconstruction was named "Gross Indecency" because the trail was against the immoral acts of Oscar Wilde (Kaufman and McAdams 95). The author successfully compiled a script that told the whole story from the first to the last trial and the punishment selected for Wilde. The play was an award-winning, thus gained popularity among the populace during that auspicious period. The perfect acting and dramatization portrayed the ideal manifestation of theoretical language.

The Gross Indecency project inspired the author to take on another project anticipating the successful reconstruction of the historical events. Through the previous experience, the author had the needed strategies to succeed on the Laramie Project tremendously. The writer aspired to comprehend every historic event that transpired in the Laramie. He discerned that the two plays had plenty of similarities. In both narrations, the main agenda was criticism against gay people since it was considered a sinful act (Kaufman and McAdams 97). Before he commenced drafting the dramatic play, the author visited the exact location where the events transpired. He aspired to accumulate knowledge about the people's beliefs and the cultures to incorporate in the play. The author refrained from reconstructing a historical event basing on the assumptions he drew from various readings. The author and all cast members socialized with all people in Laramie and asked interviews to collect handier information in drafting the final script.

However, the writer incorporated a new strategy in the Laramie Project. He became interested in learning about the town and wrote a play about the city instead of focusing on historic occasions. The author chose to change his narration from reconstructing the event to dramatizing how people residing in Laramie felt about that situation. The writer wanted to introduce another concept into the theatre that a story could deviate from dramatizing the main event to describing how that particular event made people in that environment feel and react (Kaufman and McAdams 98). Based on the Laramie Project, the author reconstructed a play on how people in the community felt about homosexuality and how they were affected. Therefore, the big question that the class should answer is, "what are the theatre aspects that an author should consider while reconstructing a play about past events?"

Work Cited

Kaufman, Moisés, and Barbara Pitts McAdams. Moment Work: Tectonic Theater Project's Process of Devising Theater. Vintage, 2018.