Sound Lesson Plan Evaluation: Thoroughness, Alignment & Cross-Conn - Essay Sample

Introduction

The need to develop a sound lesson plan evaluation framework is increasingly aligned with the prospects for determining any given teaching plan's suitability to meeting the established teaching objectives for which they are designed (Reznitskaya et al. 35). Thus, far, this article increasingly seeks to provide critical insights focusing primarily on providing a comparative analysis of two lesson plans using the following criteria, namely thoroughness. Alignment, cross-curricular connections, differentiation, and reflection.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Thoroughness

The two lesson plans highly differ concerning their levels of differentiation. The aspect of differentiation is especially key when evaluating any given lesson plan's soundness. The higher the level of differentiation, the more in-depth a given lesson plan is to meet its stated objectives. The first lesson plan covers every specific element within the content area. The first lesson plan rigorously explores the topical discussion areas' critical tenets individually, unlike the second lesson plan, which discusses both topical discussions jointly.

A lesson plan's effectiveness is reflected primarily on the level of differentiation that ensues regarding the depiction of all the critical elements for a particular topic, such as addition and subtraction. The first lesson plan has a structural plan that seemingly captures every main aspect, such as the necessary materials needed to enable varied students to develop a proper understanding of the subject concept being taught over the teaching trajectory scope. On the other hand, the latter lesson plan lacks the structural framework to explore the critical concepts of the subject taught.

Alignment

Both lesson plans similarly differ in terms of their alignment to capture all the aspects of the subject components, including the learning activities, assessments, and learning objectives. On the one hand, the first lesson exhibits a structurally adept framework that offers the best alignment to the components, as mentioned above. It provides a series of materials whose core tenets are highly designed to foster understanding amongst the students. On the other hand, the second lesson plan barely provides the basis for alignment, seeing as it discusses the lesson plan's elements rather limitedly.

Cross-Curricular Connections

Both the lesson plans lack a suitable framework that supports the cross-curriculum interconnectedness between and amongst varied disciplines. The tutors are tasked with suitable techniques for incorporating the present subject conceptual frameworks into other seemingly important disciplines for prospects.

Differentiation

Differentiation is a key tenet in a lesson plan (Reznitskaya et al. 35). The first lesson plan rigorously explores the critical tenets of the topical discussion areas individually, unlike the second lesson plan, which discusses both topical discussions jointly. A lesson plan's effectiveness is reflected primarily on the level of differentiation that ensues as regards the depiction of all the critical elements for a particular topic such as addition and subtraction. The first lesson plan has a structural plan that seemingly captures every main aspect, such as the necessary materials needed to enable varied students to develop a proper understanding of the subject concept being taught over the teaching trajectory scope.

Reflection

The first lesson plan offers several diverse questions on which to conduct assessments by the students to establish their understanding of the key concepts thus far. The second lesson plan barely provides this framework, as shown by its lack of assessment questions that provide the students with a basis to assess their understanding of the key concepts, thus, far.

Conclusion

Suffice to say, the need to evaluate lesson plans is necessary to determine the suitability of lesson planning in a bid to determine the relevance of teaching styles. The two lesson plans highly differ concerning their levels of differentiation. The aspect of differentiation is especially key when evaluating the soundness of any given lesson plan because the higher the level of differentiation, the more in-depth a given lesson plan is to meet its stated objectives. The effectiveness of a lesson plan is reflected primarily on the level of differentiation that ensues as regards the depiction of all the critical elements for a particular topic such as addition and subtraction.

Work Cited

Reznitskaya, Alina, and Ian AG Wilkinson. "Truth matters: Teaching young students to search for the most reasonable answer." Phi Delta Kappan 99.4 (2017): 33-38.