A Decision-making Model in Social Work Essay Sample

Based on the information derived from the dual relationships expert, it is important to note that specialists can come up with solutions to relationship dilemmas. However, the resolutions come in steps. Step one involves identifying the clients problem. In this case, Andys problem can be referred to Webbs text. Andy is unable to create friends in his multicultural neighbourhood and school environment. These facts generate a number of people who are related to Andys problem. First in the list is his parents and close relatives. Parents play an important role in a childs growth. Not paying close attention to a childs needs amounts to neglective behaviour on the parents part. This attitude has dire consequences on the childs development. In most cases, many kids end up disobeying and disrespecting their guardians and seniors. The group of relatives, in this case, comes in. The other party is the childs educators and hearing specialist in this case. Since Andys case is not one of misconduct, it is the responsibility of his teachers and hearing specialist to get as much information as they can from him in regards to why he behaves in a certain manner and hence establish methods that can assist him.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The question of decision making primarily lies with his parents. This duty can, however, be shared with Andys teachers and hearing expert. As Lundy explains in her book, individuals such as Andy seek the help of specialist since we are not strangers. Together with his teachers, we can form a panel of counsellors that is solely concerned with meeting the interests of Andy. This way we even take up the role of ghost counsellors with knowing it as Reamer notes. This collaboration creates an adequate group of experts that have partial motives in their decision making. Aside from deciding the most effective techniques to resolve Andys problem, we can discover much more about his problem than we had initially intended to. It is not surprising if these added observations are identified outside the therapy procedure. Actually, these observations, such as co-curricular interests in the client would help establish a common basis from which we can familiarize ourselves with the victim. Developing common ground is a very effective way of getting to know and understand someone better as Webb notes.

Every member who is indicated in step one as a team player in Andys assistance program is of significant value to him. One way or another, the victim ends up seeking assistance be it knowledge-based or financially based from his or her closest relatives, says Lohmann. This statement illustrates the imperativeness of Andys guardians and other concerned parties. Without them, his forthcoming state cannot even be imagined. There is a need to utilize each others expertise to best address Andys problem of social isolation. This way we can be able to realize our true value in an individuals life once we have succeeded in implementing our strategies. I9n Andys case, the common goal is ensuring his improved and continued interaction with other members of the school and society. The goals that come up in such a case are similar to those of every other kid in school apart from the fact that Andys will be a bit diverse due to his hearing condition.

The initial goal should be to get him to understand the significance of establishing relations with his peers. Consequently, the involved parties can then work on improving his school performance. This can, however, take some time since, without the help of his classmates, the teachers cannot guarantee that he is likely to improve since they have to cater for the needs of all learners. In addition, getting to know other learners in your level assists the learner in establishing his ability and talent. This way, he or she can identify the areas in which they need to improve on. Alternatively, they can seek the assistance of other kids who are good on the subject. As stated earlier, we could start by establishing a hobby, activity, or sport that Andy finds appealing. This way, we can introduce him to new members who enjoy the same exploits. If the appointed volunteers are patient enough, they can get Andy to express himself and open up more about his hidden thoughts. A deaf volunteer, if available, can only speed up the process of getting closer to Andy. If, however, the particular hobbies do not exist in the schools curriculum, the administration can make an effort to introduce it if it is developmental. This way, Andy could begin realizing that people really care about his interests.

The most appropriate strategy, in this case, would be to introduce Andys preferred activities into the institutions programme. Granting an individuals desires is proved to be the most effective way of getting them to commit according to their grantors desires. If Andy exhibits behaviour that suggests he appreciates the special offer, then the decision makers can begin devising a strategy through which to utilize the preferred activity to understand Andy in a better way. For example, if the activitys pleasure can be enhanced by introducing second parties, then the decision makers can begin by observing how Andy behaves if other kids generate an interest in the new activity. If he responds positively, then the strategy is deemed to have been successful. However, if Andy ejects himself from interested parties, the strategy is not effective, and the decision makers have to come up with a different means.

The discretion of information and recognition of attendees can be challenging. The trained may possibly have shared information in gatherings concerning the client. Alternatively, a decision maker might carve up information at a gathering that he or she would wish future counsellors should never find out. It is naive to imply that seeing as the information shared in gatherings is classified; there is no threat outside these meetings. Once perceived, it can manipulate perceptions and decisions. The information might concern illegal activities or rude behaviour, yet all mutual information concerns matters of confidentiality and the right to divide up with others when one decides. How can we be considerate of each others interests as professionals?

Can we still reckon habits of respecting alternatives without bearing in mind the upcoming to discover if their trails will meet in the management realm? The bounds of self-revelation within the counselling scenery are a focus of moral values and administration discourse. There is a space in the discussion about self-disclosure in unidentified support gatherings. This may be owing to the requirement of the inscrutability of the groups. However, contributors know the information listened to at a convention, even if not mutual is outside of it. What we discern controls our views about individuals and the humankind. So we have to presume that what a client recognizes about a treatment contributor will have control over the professional correlation. Naturally, the contrary is factual as well.

The most unfailing commendation for contending with any moral dilemma in this discipline or literature is the exercise of supervision(Reamer, 2012). When considering dual affiliations, some writers unlike Reamer and Webb argue for growing specificity in moral codes for problems such as addiction, even though they do not spell out disability as one of the concerns (Lohmann, 2015). Other universal recommendations consist of systematic schooling in decision-making models and ethics, using particular predicament vignettes. Again still, most instigators do not exclusively deal with concerns of decision makers.

Based on the stated realities, the following are suggested:

These matters must be examined in secure, accommodating, and private settings such as regulation and proficient peer support factions,

Debates concerning factors of privacy, self-disclosure, boundaries, discretion, and release of information have to go on under close supervision,

Professional, consumer, and administration debates concerning these matters need to notify agency guidelines.

Unambiguous policies and practices on impairment, community support, and degeneration of experts and other staff need to be identified.

Policies and legislations on sponsorship of previous and recent clients have to be developed in every agency and not just those taking care of clients with addiction problems.

Establishment of unambiguous processes to resolve the concerns of clients concerning dual affiliations, secrecy in the community and related matters is essential.

Customary provision of systematic education on morals, for all counsellors, needs to be introduced. It should consist of a decisive and considerate development of issues in daily practice rather than focusing on bizarre case-based problems.

Conclusion

This piece of writing has analysed the case of a deaf kid with a social problem. Some problems that experts in human service fields face that need extra information when dual relations become challenging have also been addressed. Many situations within the human service have unique moral issues that emerge on an everyday basis. Experts operating within the Deaf commune have to balance subtle issues of providing efficient provisions while upholding suitable boundaries. Existing ethical principles do not consist of precise references to potentially tricky situations that face therapists, particularly in the field of dual relationships.

References

In Lohmann, N., & In Lohmann, R. A. (2015). Rural social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press

Lundy, C., & Lundy, C. (2011). Social work, social justice & human rights: A structural approach to practice. North York, Ont: University of Toronto Press

Reamer, F. G. (2013). Social work values and ethics. New York: Columbia University Press

Reamer, F. G., & Reamer, F. G. (2012). Boundary issues and dual relationships in the human services. New York: Columbia University Press

Webb, N. B. (2011). Culturally diverse parent-child and family relationships: A guide for social workers and other practitioners. New York: Columbia University Press