Free Essay on Navigating Juvenile Justice: Criteria, Challenges, and the Pursuit of Rehabilitation

Introduction

The evaluation of the juvenile for the policies on the policy that necessitate considerable changes of emerging cases of underage children. In the 1800s,’ there were no cases of underage (Bonham Jr. & Reddington, 2016). Still, due to the evolution of time, with more free playing time and the minors spending time on drugs, rape cases, and immorality consideration hence making the courts an alternative to treating criminal patients of a young age. The revolution of generations, there have been various considerations of needing to necessitate the charges in the juvenile court (Bonham Jr. & Reddington, 2016). There are several evaluations of policies transfer in juveniles helping out of the health. The scrutiny of the criteria of the guidelines needs to have its needs in the analysis.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Criteria for Policy in Juvenile Transfer

There are several criteria for juvenile transfer for consideration of having the management of the solution of the juvenile case in the current generation (Barrett & Daroczy, 2017). The organizations, judiciary, and society must have scrutiny of criteria for selecting a considerable permanent solution.

Support of Youth Reentry

The juvenile issues need to be hedged in consideration of effective justice to the young generation. The support for reentry of the youth to the economic and religious social interaction (Farnham, 2016). The endowment of the child in the social class and drug evection sensitization hence making the cases of the juvenile be in control and fewer cases of crime minors.

Fairness and Safety for Court-Involved in Youth

The safety of courts and the fairness and justice among the youth being charged are necessary. Among the policies of juvenile transfer, there is a need to have safety and fairness in the verdict and justice ruling for the young generation (Reddinton & Gene, 2018). With the support of the federal states and national government, it is necessary to have straightforward safety court fairness.

Remove of Youth from The Adult Justice System

The isolation of youth from adult consideration of having minors favored justice considering their ages (Bonham Jr. & Reddington, 2016). The juvenile courts are in favor of the essential policies to transfer children to their courts to have justice (O'Toole, 2010). It is necessary for considerable procedures for evaluating juveniles.

Using Diversion Strategies

Using diverse strategies in tackling the juvenile system, helps in solutions to criminal cases. It is necessary to have a strategy in place for considerable improvement and transfer of challenging issues (Reddinton & Gene, 2018). The techniques help in laying down fundamental issues of policies to have exact steps to have a juvenile transfer to problem-solving.

Prioritization and Early Intervention

Early intervention and correction of problems are significant and long-term considerations to have the issue addressed at an early age. Early intervention and scrutinizing the challenging issues necessitate correctional and probation associations to ensure juvenile cases are reduced (Farnham, 2016). It is sufficient to correct the problem at an early age for a permanent solution.

Federal Leadership Juvenile Justice Policy Restoration

The federal leadership in a nation helps in the dynamic procedural improvement of juvenile justice (Reddinton & Gene, 2018). The support of the state leaders needs to have elaborative steps and strategies to ensure there is a need for collective government policies to ensure the eradication of juvenile cases

Setting Up Rehabilitation Sites

The rehabilitation helps in the regaining of the astray character in a person. The habits are tamed to fit into society's necessities (Bonham Jr. & Reddington, 2016). It is helpful to have the nation with the help of the government on the court probation detainment to the minors to have the rehabilitation to regain their character in the sense of the drugs and criminal issues like theft.

The Position of Juvenile Transfer Policy

Juvenile transfer is an acceptable policy for reducing the issues in consideration of the minor’s criminal cases. To necessitate to ensure that there is a need to have an elaborative permanent solution and adjustment of the social, educational, and long-term federal solution of the juvenile cases (Farnham, 2016). It is of good help in society to ensure that there is a need to provide permanent consideration of the juvenile policy transfer. However, there are some of the disadvantages of the juvenile transfer policy. Some terrorists take advantage of the minors' lenient court ruling to use the kids in performing the terrorist attacks. It is harmful to society and too dangerous to a nation.

Status of Meeting or Failing Criteria

The status of the criteria of the juvenile transfer policy is of great help considering the solution of transferring the young transfer policy (Bonham Jr. & Reddington, 2016). There are significant advantages in a nation of rehabilitation sites to curve the behaviors of minors in consideration to have healthy social catering more so the young generation (Reddinton & Gene, 2018). However, in some states of federalism, they ignore juvenile scrutiny and evolution hence punishing the minors in unfair consideration.

References

Barrett, K. L., & Daroczy, L. L. (2017). Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118524275.ejdj0093

Farnham, C. M. (2016). Beyond the consent of the governed. Page Publishing.

O'Toole, R. (2010). The citizens' guide to transportation Reauthorization. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1543932

Reddinton, F. P., & Gene, B. J. (2018). Flawed Criminal Justice Policies; At the intersection of the media, public fear, and legislative response (2nd ed.). Oxford.