Gorges Suffering Based on Christian Perspective - Essay Sample

Introduction

Spirituality is described as a form of connection that human beings have with a superior being who they believe has the power to give a life meaning and help them in difficult circumstances. From a Christian viewpoint, suffering and fallenness are thought to be inseparable (Langley, 2014). This started when Adam and Eve lived in the Garden of Eden, and they assumed the liability of sustaining God's creation. Besides, they openly gobbled anything they wanted till the day Eve eats from the tree of good and evil. As a result, God chased them from the Garden of Eden. Their action destroyed the world, and God isolated himself from them.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Consequently, God decided to reprimand them for their transgressions. Thus, Christians think that the fallenness of the world from Adam and Eve is the explanation concerning why there is languishing. Moreover, God reviled Eve and Adam and disclosed that they would now be working hard to get food to eat. Besides, human wretchedness is a type of punishment from God.

George presumably likens his suffering to being a sinner and what God claimed that one needs to endure because of sin. As individuals, we sin regularly, and it is not joint and successive for us to live according to God's will. Likewise, it would be argued the same for George's case. Additionally, George is plausible to approve his suffering to the idea that all individuals are sinners, and individuals have missed the mark concerning the magnificence and glory of God. It is not our will, yet individuals are negatively affected by God's curse because we sinned from Adam and Eve's time. People have undermined everything that God provided, and thus, we merit God's judgment and punishment alongside the suffering. Moreover, George should potentially comfort himself because, as human beings, we suffer due to our sins.

George suffering Based on Christian narrative

The death and resurrection of Jesus demonstrated that there exists eternal life through life after death. Jesus Christ suffered in His last days on earth in the hands of the people He came to save. Hope during suffering makes it easy for Christians to be equipped for experiencing the journey of sickness and suffering. The death and resurrection of Jesus showed hope for the suffering and dying individuals (Langley, 2014). Also, the journey to Calvary was not prosperous and was influenced by suffering. Starting from the temptations in the wilderness to the time Jesus was crucified and executed, means Jesus Christ endured a great deal. In any case, its most indispensable component was the resurrection of Jesus after three days, Jesus Christ. This is the stage where hope and suffering got rejoined.

George needs to look into Job's story and see how he endured pain and suffering and the restoration he underwent after suffering. Job lost his property and children, but he devoted his life to God and confided in him. As a result, Job was compensated a hundred times. This was a more significant amount of what he lost and what he had previously. The two circumstances can help to comfort Gorge in the sense that although he will suffer, God will finally restore his health and wellbeing, and if he dies, he would have a never-ending life.

George’s Christian Worldview on the Value of his Life

How Gorge contemplates life is by visioning the value of his life when he stays healthy. George does not think having low personal satisfaction is what ought to happen. Being autonomous and not ready to play out life's day to day exercises would be a sign that he despises life. . Besides, his concern generally has a daily existence that makes him a hostage of his body. For instance, it dumbfounds him that he would get tormented, suffers, and even loses his capacity, dignity, power, and pride. Since he thinks he is a powerful individual, he believes that he should be excluded from pain and suffering. However, it is also unlikely that he should not suffer and endures or carries on with a weakening life with the obligation he has in the general public. George is not ready to live a life of suffering because he is set up to find himself in this state. This is why he prefers and has the motivation behind voluntary euthanasia where his life would be purposely ceased with the goal for him not to feel the enduring just as the agony that anticipates him (Cholbi, 2017). Succinctly, George does not want to carry on with a life of pain and suffering.

Based on the Christian viewpoint, Gorge does not seem to have any gratefulness for life since it is just God who structures lives, and he is the one in particular who should take life. Thus, my perspective on the issue is that George needs to carry on with an appropriate life, improve his health, and live a quality life. George does not understand the value of life, which is why he considers proceeding with euthanasia.

The Christian worldview on Euthanasia

From a Christian point of view, what George is thinking about is hugely mistaken. In any case, concerning its cheerful piece, this would shield him from pain and suffering and offer his relatives ample time to deal with his situation because they will not be committed to care for him and deal with his welfare. From a Christian stance, life is sanctified and holy. No person has the right to take a life because it is God who gives and takes life.

At the point when God created man through the dirt, he used the soil to put life into humanity. Moreover, life is the main thing that God gave to a man since the soil has its place with the earth. Life is exceptionally sanctified, starting from birth, conception, and adulthood to death. Taking life either through abortion, murder, or euthanasia can be seen as examined interfering with the work of God. God is the Utmost Being who has the role and responsibility to give and take life. Additionally, the main incentive to reflect as a Christian is the thankfulness and regard for confidence in God alongside life.

Although Gorges' situation may validate the motivation behind euthanasia, it is still not the best option as a Christian because we have no right to take life. Likewise, as an individual who regards and acknowledges life and trusts in God, George should decide to live his last days, believing that God can reestablish his wellbeing and health back once more. Regardless of whether he carries on with personal satisfaction and quality of life that he views as low, it does not warrant sufficient reasons why he should go for euthanasia. Remarkably, it is the obligation of God to give and take life as he wishes. Moreover, even in pain and suffering, George should search for an explanation regarding why he is alive since willful extermination cannot be defended in Christianity. Interestingly, it is wrong for Christians to consider euthanasia from a common viewpoint because it takes away a person's life, yet God has a duty to take and give life.

The Option that is Morally Justified in the Christian Worldview

George needs to be put under his family or nurse's care to care for him, offer support, and provide for his needs. Likewise, there is a need for profound spiritual prayers, in addition to spiritual guidance that he can pursue through reading the Bible. Besides, reading the Bible should form the primary piece of his day by day activities. Other than this, George should go for counseling because he has stayed for almost half a decade with issues of immobility. Undergoing psychological therapy would help him understand his condition and accept his life the way it is rather than contemplating euthanasia.

The Decision I Would Take in George's Situation

It is difficult to decide from a perspective contrasted with a Christian viewpoint. Since notwithstanding the point that George will undergo pain and suffering, dealing with a person's life need to be esteemed from a Christian angle. From a Christian perspective, an individual could consider deciding to experience euthanasia or not make it a choice dependent upon how their life quality would be affected. Besides, patient autonomy is critical and should be considered, and what the person wants should be delivered.

After analyzing the province of George's condition, there is a good purpose behind undergoing euthanasia. This is because most of the activities that assist a person with carrying on with a basic life are contrarily affected (Kakar, 2014). For instance, if George cannot inhale and eat appropriately, at that point, this demonstrates that his probabilities of endurance are little, and regardless of whether George is taken care of through the use of different methods. If he lives by life-uphold machines, there is no confirmation that he will be well or his circumstance will change. At this point it may be proper to go through euthanasia.

Conclusion

From a Christian viewpoint, suffering and fallenness are thought to be inseparable. However, the death and resurrection of Jesus demonstrated that there exists eternal life through life after death. Hope during suffering makes it easy for Christians to be equipped for experiencing the journey of sickness and suffering. George needs to look into Job's story and see how he endured pain and suffering and the restoration he underwent after suffering. As a result, Job was compensated a hundred times. George does not understand the value of life, which is why he considers proceeding with euthanasia. Taking life either through abortion, murder, or euthanasia can be seen as examined interfering with the work of God. God is the Utmost Being who has the role and responsibility to give and take life. Thus, although Gorges' situation may validate the motivation behind euthanasia, it is still not the best option as a Christian because we have no right to take life.

References

Cholbi, M. J. (2017). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Global Views on Choosing to End Life. Santa Monica, CA: Praeger.

Kakar, S. (2014). Death and Dying. London, England: Penguin UK.

Langley, S. N. (2014). Death, Resurrection, and Transporter Beams: An Introduction to Five Christian Views on Life after Death. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.