|Type of paper:||Presentation|
|Categories:||Terrorism Interpersonal communication|
As well as satisfying emotional and practical needs, interpersonal communication plays a significant role in enhancing our social relationships. We can define interpersonal communication as a unique form of human interaction that happens when two or more people talk to each other and try to influence each other, generally for the objective of managing relationships (Thackrah, 2013). Interpersonal communication can occur face to face, online or through mobile/telephone, which aids in maintaining personal bonds. Terrorism has brought about fear among the members of the society and the world at large, and there have been a few online communication solutions that can help inform, educate as well as warn people about terrorism. This paper discusses how online communication can be improved in today's world.
International reactions to global terrorism do respond to the complicated nature of terrorism, which complexity has a reflection on the complexity of interaction and its impact of a set of significant problems upon the quality of terrorism, and the nature of terrorism policing. By addressing the sets of challenges, it offers the analytical matrix for the guidelines that successful counterterrorism necessitates (Greenberg, 2002). The former holds a new paradigm in global strategic analysis and global counter-terrorism. By demonstrating its inherent quality and its general validity in an exemplary and highly eloquent manner, the model holds the epistemological matrix for the building for the new counter-terrorism paradigm. The paradigm stems from the maxim that terrorism policing is more than policing terrorism- policing the nexus between crime, social unrest and immigration in multi-ethnic and multi-cultural open societies in times where the conventional and paradigmatic use and conception of both, immigration and acculturation (Jaishankar & Nati Ronel, 2011). They tend to be supplanted by intra-ethnic and inter-cultural migration and wherein acculturation, in the paradigmatic sense of the word, have become irrelevant.
Few challenges point that terrorism has turned out to be more pervasive globally because of the processes and global technologies. The advances of technology linked with globalization have enhanced the capacities of these terrorist groups to plan and carry out operation with more devastation and cooperation than their predecessors could have thought of (Korstanje, 2017). Technologies, in particular, have progressed the capacity of teams and cells in areas such as security, proselytizing, lethality and coordination.
Courses in terrorism can have numerous educational objectives- to define and differentiate between the state as an agent of terrorist attacks and acts of non-state terrorist teams. Specific conceptual frameworks for analyzing terror apply to every terror team examined. One can differentiate the controversies surrounding the use of terror and the function of the media in the society, security of hostages, and preservation of civil rights in a democratic world (Semetko & Scammell, 2012). One can articulate and define the value position of methods of reconciling values like justice and freedom or how to preserve life and security in the globe comprising terror and political violence. But for these courses to take place, there must be improvements in international communication online so that everyone gains all the knowledge and information without challenges.
There are three ways to improve interpersonal communication online about terrorism. First, social media publicity should be more aggressive, conclude the number of posts or comments about crisis by valence; the number of visitors, followers, subscribers, or crisis-related links to and from other sites; attributes of comments and posts, and word of mouth. Second, extending organizational-public relationship by adding the organization-blogger relationship, blogger-follower relationship, and blogger-issue relationship. Finally, there can be involvement of economic value, where there is more aggressive and strict reduction of negative public emotion, increased amount acceptance, critical public awareness and civic engagement (The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 2011). More so, use of filters on social media sites such as Facebook should be taken very seriously, as some people post fake news and might come up with wrong information about terrorists and scare the audience.
When social media publicity becomes more useful when disseminating information to every social media site, the data can warn or educate the audience on the progress of terrorism in the world. Blogs are also essential. If there can be terrorism-specific blogs that only talk about terrorism and allow the audience to respond and offer their opinions, social media interaction amplifies. Another thing, perhaps ensuring that the internet is accessible in all regions, then online use can be more useful. Online communication should also be made cheap, by publication of free articles, platforms that are easily accessible and do not consume money when accessed and allowing for open communication among all members. With this in mind, a mass audience will be aware of terrorism and help prevent it from occurring, identify the terrorists, and always informed of a terrorist attack so that they can safeguard themselves. This thus reduces the rate of terrorist attacks in the world, since people are free to interact and there is a bond that has brought people together, and that is the internet.
Nonetheless, communication hurdles never cease to exist. Despite all the efforts, there are some specific issues such as technical errors which thus lead to ineffective communication. Also, there are people who always tend to disagree or be on the appositive of the majority. Such people prevent cooperation and interpersonal relationships. Language barrier can also be a significant challenge when disseminating information concerning terrorism. However, still, these little solutions can play a significant role in improving online interpersonal relationships in the world today.
Greenberg, B. S. (2002). Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11. Hampton Press.
In Semetko, H. A., & In Scammell, M. (2012). The SAGE handbook of political communication.
KORSTANJE, M. A. X. I. M. I. L. I. A. N. O. E. (2017). Threat mitigation and detection of cyber warfare and terrorist activities. HERSHEY: INFORMATION SCI REFER IGI.
South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology (Tirunelveli, India), K. Jaishankar, and Nati Ronel. 2011. First International Conference of the South Asian Society [of] Criminology and Victimology (SASCV): 15-17 January 2011, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India: SASCV 2011: conference proceedings. Tirunelveli: South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology.
Thackrah, J. R. (2013). Dictionary of Terrorism. Routledge. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cite this page
Free Essay: How Can Interpersonal Communication Be Improved in Today's Online World?. (2022, Apr 05). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.net/essays/how-can-interpersonal-communication-be-improved-in-todays-online-world
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal: