Sexual Behavior and Structural Functionalism Theory - Essay Sample

Introduction

Sexual behavior is the expression of how different people express and experience their sexuality in society. The sexuality that an individual identifies with is essential in the various activities they engage in as they live. The various activities that are associated with sexuality play multiple roles in ensuring sustainability in society. Sexuality can be explained using numerous schools of thought, one being the structural functionalism theory. Sexual functionalism theory is a view of society as being composed of various social and biological needs. Sexuality and the structural functionalism theory have a common aspect regarding the assurance of sustainability and continuity in communities' multiple activities. Structural functionalism theory supports sexuality by explaining how the various gender roles help ensure stability and solidarity in the various activities in the societies. Traditionally, some functions are associated with a specific gender. Furthermore, some activities overlap and involve both genders. All activities that involve the two genders are structurally meant to enhance the achievement of specified objectives.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Sexuality and Functions in Society

The significant aspect of social functionalism theory and sexual behavior is the interaction between the genders to enhance society's sustainability. The continuity takes both a social and biological perspective. From a social perspective, various social activities are assigned to the two genders, specifically (Izadi et al., 2020). For example, the two genders are assigned different responsibilities in a social setting. In most settings, the male takes the upper hand in establishing connections in society. Through the links, human beings develop relationships among them. The relationships are relied upon in various ways, which enhances sustainability and continuity in society. For example, when communities interact, they share resources and capabilities. Based on the strengths and abilities of the different aspects of sexual behavior, there is the assurance of continuity. The continuity is enhanced by the interaction and various contributions by the people. In the long run, there are string bods among the people, which go on for a long time, contributing to sustainability.

The other aspect that explains sexual behavior in the sexual functionalism theory takes the biological perspective. The pillars of the structural, functional functionalism are in the specified roles and adaptations of the different forms of sexuality and their transformations to ensure continuity (Fisher, 2010). When there is an adaptation of the different genders, they have structural differences that contribute towards their sustainability. From a biological perspective, different genders have structural adaptations that enhance adaptation. The continuity of the society is assured by the aspect of childbearing, which highlights the sustainability aspect of the structural functionalism theory. The male and female gender is structurally and functionally adapted in different ways to enhance childbearing. The bodies have other functions that lead to conception and birth, therefore ensuring society's continuity from a biological perspective. Thus, in a family setting, there is the continuity assured because of the role of childbearing, which leads to childbirth, therefore achieving the goal of continuity and sustainability. Therefore, based on a family setting, there is sexual behavior explained by the structural-functionalism aspect of generational continuity and sustainability.

The structural, functional theory can explain sexual behavior from the different sexes' roles in a cultural setting. In most cases, women were assigned a nurturing role in society (Kingsbury & Scanzoni, 2009). They were responsible for taking care of the family's welfare. Taking care of the children and the entire family was assigned to the women. The structural functionalism theory explains the role based on the women's capabilities makes them great at nurturing. Through nurturing the family, which is a basic unit, their wellness was guaranteed. That is, a highlight is a sexual behavior playing an essential role in the continuity of the society based on the structural adaptations and roles associated with the societies' views of roles assigned to different genders.

Society's roles and norms are associated with sexual behavior, which function sees wellness and sustainability in different ways. Security is an essential perspective of security and the assurance of continuity within the societies. There is a link between men's role, sexual behavior, and safety in the community. The first perspective of security is from an economic perspective. The men were tasked with the role of sourcing for resources that enhance the comfort and wellness of the people. They were charged with ensuring there were adequate resources to ensure the sustainability of livelihood. That shaped the ideas and norms that empowered men; to ensure they obtained economic resources. The other aspect is physical security, which provides people who are secure from adverse situations or causes. Therefore, sexual behavior is explained by the structural functionalism theory from a security perspective.

Conclusion

The structural, functional theory explains the roles, norms, and practices in the society that enhance its existence from multiple perspectives. The communities are composed of different aspects of that work together to improve sustainability in the long run. Furthermore, there is sexual behavior, which explains the various activities done by people of different genders. Sexual behavior is explained by structural-functionalism based on the different roles that are assigned to different genders. Sexual behavior and structural functionalism, therefore, share the same objective of sustainability. The various aspects of sexual behavior work in structurally adapted roles to enhance sustainability in different social units.

References

Fisher, J. (2010). Systems theory and structural functionalism (Vol. 1). https://0-works.bepress.com.library.simmons.edu/john_fisher/5/

Izadi, A., Mohammadi, M., Nasekhian, S., & Memar, S. (2020). Structural Functionalism, Social Sustainability and the Historic Environment: A Role for Theory in Urban Regeneration. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 1-23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17567505.2020.1723248

Kingsbury, N., & Scanzoni, J. (2009). Structural-functionalism. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 195-221). Springer, Boston, MA. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_9