Treating Aggression in Male Prisoners - Essay Sample

Many prisoners involuntarily undergo extreme psychological changes trying to survive the experience in prison. The variation to detainment is quite often troublesome and, now and again, makes tendencies for intuition and acting that can be useless in times of post-jail adjustment. However, the psychological impacts of imprisonment change from individual to individual and are often reversible. Indeed, at that point, not every person who is imprisoned is crippled or mentally hurt by it. In any case, scarcely any individuals are much unaltered or sound by the experience. In any event, jail is excruciating, and imprisoned people frequently experience the ill effects of being exposed to torment, hardship, and amazingly atypical examples and living standards and cooperating with others.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Prison services are focused on ensuring the inmates are not released to the public without maintaining their aggressive issues. Instinct theory elaborates that aggression in human beings is an inborn biological drive that has similarities to hunger. This means that it is impossible to eradicate, but it can be put under control for the benefit of everyone in society (Branscombe & Baron n.d). This theory adds that if the victims are involved in activities such as sports, then they can channel their aggressive energy towards that sporting activity and have a feeling of relaxation.

When it comes to drive theory and reducing aggression amongst inmates, internal motivation and arousal are addressed if the victim is to achieve a particular goal. When convicted individuals end their jail terms, they are allowed back to society. However, this is accompanied by too much watching by members of the public, and this may create anxiety and tension to these ex-convicts (Branscombe & Baron n.d). They might hold on to thoughts and inconsistent beliefs. Cognitive dissonance theory holds that if any individual is confronted by two thoughts or beliefs, which are often contradicting in nature, then he may experience psychological tension. The victims have the urge to modify their beliefs and thoughts in order to control the psychological tension he may be experiencing.

It is widely notable that television plays an important role in shaping the deeds of a person. There is a very thin line between media and aggressiveness. There have been various examinations that criminal behavior and aggressiveness are widely related. For incarcerated viewers, watching television is a very lively activity that will help in easing the tension and aggressiveness that some of them have (Branscombe & Baron n.d). Televisions are a perfect way to promote a change of character, and some programs could be tuned in to assist in this.

When the incarcerated persons are not exposed to violent behaviors portrayed by some television programs, then it is easier to present them with the positive programs. There are endless advantages to innovations and televisions, including the possibility to highlight important abilities. Conducting a detailed investigation about Television programs and motion pictures before the incarcerated individuals are allowed to watch, and cooperate with them will go far in assisting them to stay away from risky, aggressive behaviors.

Cognitive dissonance theory was advanced by L. Festinger, an American psychologist. It states that individuals strive to remain consistent following their beliefs and thoughts. Cognitive dissonance is experienced when there is inconsistency in the way a person thinks, believes, or behaves. It is considered as a state which is aversive in nature and a trigger to different mechanisms and settings that result in the return of cognitions to the individuals. Incarcerated individuals may be required to undergo initiations in order to be accepted back to the society, and after such initiations, they realize that they may not achieve the expectations they had in mind. It is this kind of outcome that results in cognitive dissonance since the behaviors needed and the belief the person initially had over the society have inconsistency.

Cognitive dissonance is crucial in the behaviors of incarcerated persons, especially when they are required to choose between options. The rejected ones always have characteristics that are desirable, and when an irreversible change is made, feelings of discomfort are experienced, and they are often associated with cognitive dissonance. The major role played by this theory is that when an alternative is selected, it is usually founded on the fact that it is desirable. Moreover, when that decision is finally made, how the assessment will be conducted changes.

However, a clear relationship is not expected even after a particular suggestion has been made, and this is due to the existing mediating variables. The decision about the socially accepted, adequate, change the behavior cognition and factors that many people consider as rewarding. Society, according to them, looks at it as the perfect behavior. Incarcerated individuals may resolve violence as a way to achieve their goals, and this is implicit. This is the main reason why socially disallowed behaviors raise high levels of satisfaction and acceptance among these individuals who choose to skip precepts that are accepted socially. In such instances, cognitive dissonance steps in to and works through decision making between pleasure and aggression. The second method it works is, no matter the type of population or kind of people, low dissonance tension and anxiety should be expected in felons because, to them, violence is more rewarding as compared to what other normal people view it.

I believe everyone is entitled to his or her own decision, and of course, they fully understand that choices have consequences. There are people that believe in aggression but advocate for other methods to resolve disputes. There is a huge difference since they are not aggressive in any way. They tend to hold on to their piece and resolve their interpersonal differences amicably. They have the idea that everyone wants to win any argument, either using violence or whichever means necessary. Felons may be aggressive because of the nature they were brought up, their relationship with others, and what they were exposed to overtime.

Nonetheless, I do not believe this is the most effective way to deal with when you come across an individual who fails to agree with you as one does not need to be hostile and aggressive in the middle of a dialogue. Generally, life is preferably conceptual, and there is certainly moreover a solitary method to decipher what is happening around you, so why not utilize this for your potential benefit and learn and see some new points of view? Rather than attempting to force the other individual with your supposition, and discretionarily excuse their assessment simultaneously, attempt to comprehend their conclusion and viewpoint on the issue.

You do not develop and advance by contending with others; you develop and advance by increasing new experiences, beliefs, and points of view. Everybody has their own novel arrangement of life encounters that make them think and see things with a particular goal in mind, so why not utilize this for your potential benefit. Empower an exchange with those that you cannot help contradicting, regardless of whether it implies essentially saying to them, 'That is fascinating, for what reason do you feel that way?' and afterward tuning in to what they need to state.

In conclusion, felons and ex-convicts should be treated in a more humane way to allow them back into society. Support and help groups provide a safe haven for these individuals as they can open up without being judged by anyone. Aggressiveness and anger are better dealt with if the victim can express their feelings without frustrations, and the first step is always listening to what they undergo in their everyday life.

References

Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (n.d). Social Psychology (14th ed.). Pearson.