Right to Privacy and Abortion. Essay Example

It is undoubtedly evident that, for the longest time ever, there has been an assortment of debates and queries regarding the privileges of privacy that are granted to a particular individual. Besides, these deliberations and cases have shifted further in the direction of abortion too. In this particular essay, I envision summarizing the significant points in the lecture delivered by Professor Geisler on the right to privacy and abortion.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Principally, the initial point is that the lecturer commences with an illustration of the Griswold vs. Connecuit case. The court maintained correctly that the constitution failed to offer any protection to the right of marital privacy contrary to the state precincts on contraception. Although the court expounded that the constitution was unable to safeguard a general privilege of privacy unambiguously, the numerous assurances within the Bill of Rights established distinct penumbras that inaugurated a right to privacy. Indeed, the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 9th Amendments ensured a right to privacy in marital relations.

Secondly, there is the illustration of the Stanley vs. Georgia case. In this particular case, the Supreme Court delivered a precise pronouncement that prompted an establishment of an obscure "right to privacy" in United States law. Notably, this was done in the form of sheer tenure of obscene materials. Besides, through the First Amendment, as smeared to the states by the Fourteenth, secluded ownership of obscenity was guaranteed to be permissible.

The third point relates to the Texas abortion laws. Specifically, the professor expounds on the Texas district court ruling. The court ruled that the state's abortion prohibition was illegitimate for the primary rationale; it desecrated a constitutional privilege to privacy. Consequently, there was the pronouncement that there would be a prosecution for doctors who continued to perform abortions. Subsequent to the declaration, there was an appeal of the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 1973, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that appropriately struck down the Texas rule that had prohibited the act of abortion. It was meritoriously legalized. The court acknowledged that a lady's right to an abortion was inherent in the right to privacy safeguarded by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

The fourth point of the lecture happens to be the numerous reasons that would prompt a lady to commit or desire to commit an abortion. Some of the primary rationales include the following:

• Age
• Economic reasons
• Rape
• Incest
• The condition or nature of the life of the mother
• Career among others

In conclusion, Professor Geisler recognizes that the issue of committing abortion can be viewed differently. In essence, this can be articulated in the following ways: First, the act of committing abortion can be made illegal in all jurisdictions. Precisely this means that no matter the circumstance, in the event an individual commits the act, they are obliged to face the consequences as stipulated in the law. Secondly, there is the aspect whereby there is a variation in regard to the numerous states and federals. Some states may opt to allow or instead permit the act of committing an abortion, whereas some may opt against that. Thirdly, there is the aspect whereby, all jurisdictions ensure that the abortion deed is made entirely legitimate.