What Characterizes a Good Research Argument According to Greene and Wise Beliefs? Essay Sample

A good research argument should have an opinion or a thesis statement and provides a discussion with the intents of convincing the reader on the views or opinions that one wishes to pass through. The whole process comprises of discussing your opinion or stand with someone or something. The importance of providing an argument in the research is to disclose your disagreement or agreement on a specific topic of discussion. Therefore, a good research argument should be strong and comprehensive as well as persuasive enough to resolve the argument reasonably.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

For instance in the case of Tim Wise, the writer of the article, "Colorblind," he presents an opinion and he goes a step further to provide an extensive discussion as well as backing up his ideas in a logical manner. The author offers an incisive assessment of colorblind race perceptions in America. He supports this notion by elaborating that being blind to color is equivalent to being blind to the consequences of color thus making it difficult to solve the issue of racial inequality (Wise, Par 10). Nonetheless, the author's article is rich in information, critiques and above it all, it offers an alternative to what he describes as a dominant and destructive belief as he provides a compelling argument on the so-called "Age of Obama." In this regard, Tim Wise's approach to argumentative research is a reflection of an ideal research argument compared with Greene's perception.

On the other hand, Greene's ideas about research are viewed as a form of conversation with other persons. He suggests that, after taking on this metaphorical understanding, the study carried out becomes very well-articulated. Notably, Greene's three-step approach to addressing the context is also universal and a crucial process. After identifying the issue at hand, whether dynamic or not, the author of the report can then place his thoughts at one of the sides of the overarching conflict (Greene, Par 17). Moreover, the situation provides the writer with an opportunity to consider changing some ideas based on the setting involved.

However, the problem with Greene's ideas about framing is that he spends most of those pages providing examples of framing in action. In as much as the breakdown of framing was essential and detailed, the pages set aside for long passages of other author's work appears to be unnecessary. Nonetheless, the reader will be left feeling overwhelmed due to the various examples provided. Contrary, Tim develops a very compelling topic on the acute issue of race in America. He establishes facts that seek to support arguments well as providing relevant clarifications on some of the values to the audience.

To sum up, Tim Wise's book represents an excellent research argument since he follows the standard steps required to write strong argumentative research. He provides clear reasoning as well as providing a discussion on the ideology of color-blind racism and how it functions by defending and justifying the current racial order. His arguments represent courageous public voices on the racial inequality, absurdity, and resurgence of post-racial liberalism in the world that is deep-rooted in racial disparity and structural inequality. What makes this argumentative research even more powerful is the provision of practical solutions to the issue at hand as well as promoting new techniques of thinking that will inspire the reader to identify the dissimilarities and to transcend them.

Works Cited

Greene, Stuart. "Argument as a Conversation the Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument." Research Processes and Practices. Boynton/Cook: Portsmouth, NH. PDF.

Wise, Tim. Colorblind: the rise of post-Racial politics and the retreat from racial equity. City Lights Books, 2010.