Adopt a Child Essay Sample

How to adopt a child

There has been an ongoing debate on adoption of children based on the marital statuses of individuals. Some people believe that the decision should be founded on the best interest of every kid. Others argue that adoption rights should be restricted to single people and opened entirely for married couples. With that in mind, it ought to be noted that children are waiting to be adopted, which means that any person who meets the criteria, married or single, should be granted a chance.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

First of all, there is a shortage of individuals who are interested in adopting older, disabled, and children of color. In fact, 408,425 kids in the United States have no paternal parents and would wish to be taken in by fortunate adults. Furthermore, single people are open to adopting these children in the sense that approximately 33% are given to unmarried individuals in the U.S (Baccara, Collard-Wexler, Felli, & Yariv, 2014). Critics would argue that a kid will be happier with both parents as they need male and female models in life than with one. However, it ought to be noted that such children need love, which means that it does not matter if the interested party is single or married. Therefore, as long as one can support the kid, it is advisable that they are granted the opportunity to adopt.

Moreover, some children may prefer to relate to a single parent in case there are negative relations in the past. Therefore, there is a need to give them a chance to associate with either a mother or father of their choice rather than just married couples (Ishizawa & Kubo, 2014). However, there should be considerations that the umarried individual may decide to form a relationship in the future. Single potential adopters can extend so much to a child in the sense that they can focus all their efforts towards meeting the child’s needs (Ishizawa & Kubo, 2014). The Unmarried Equality notion suggests that decisions to take in a homeless kid ought to be based on their best interests to the latter, which explains why there need to be professionals involved when making such critical choices (Baccara et al., 2014). With that in mind, single individuals should not be left out in the adoption processes based on the argument that they are unmarried.

Finally, single parent adoption offers a more solid home than a married couples’ environment. Indeed, it is a place free from any divorce issues and instability, which can both affect a child’s development. Research has shown that single parents attain the highest levels of education and have bigger earnings than the average couples (Berger, 2015). Therefore, they have proven that they are capable of handling adoption as they have established sufficient and sustainable grounds to do so in their homes. With this in mind, there is no tangible reason to deny them the right to assume the responsibility of bringing up a child. Critics may quote religion that it takes a man and a woman to conceive (Berger, 2015). However, this should not be the basis for discriminating single parents from adopting children.

In general, single people should be granted equal rights to adopt children as easily as married couples. There are thousands of kids in care centers waiting to have parents, which gives enough reason for anyone able and willing to assume responsibility to be given a chance. Despite the critics’ arguments that a kid needs both parents to grow up well, there are benefits of them being in a single’s home.

References

Baccara, M., Collard-Wexler, A., Felli, L., & Yariv, L. (2014). Child-adoption matching: Preferences for gender and race. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(3), 133-158.

Berger, B. R. (2015). In the name of the child: Race, gender, and economics in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. Fla. L. Rev., 67, 295.

Ishizawa, H., & Kubo, K. (2014). Factors affecting adoption decisions: Child and parental characteristics. Journal of Family Issues, 35(5), 627-653.