Type of paper:Â | Movie review |
Categories:Â | Racism Movie Social issue |
Pages: | 7 |
Wordcount: | 1809 words |
Eastwood is among the most significant political filmmaker acting great films of the year. Following his new acted film, "The Mule," he tries to show his own past life exposing his failure and inflicts that failure within the society set up and tries to show the possibility of success trapped within the regrets. "The mule" is a movie involving identity politics. The director of the film Clint Eastwood focuses on whites through the film. The absence of the blacks in the movie raises the question of Clint's cinematography journey. The paper investigates the political meaning of the film "the mule" and tries to justify the changes in Clint Eastwood movie directing over time.
He plays the actor of a drug smuggler with the Mexicans as well as getting involved even being portrayed as a non-responsible father. The adventure and achievements are set against expectations and prejudice time, driving both women and men into a non-avoidable conflict. Being the main actor of the film and the director, he contemplates the whole path of life through the filming of events to demonstrate his regrets and wonders of the life he lived.
The movie reflects a rigorous experience of trying to outlive someone's beliefs by clearly scrutinizing through the past in a regretting manner to identify oneself within the ultimate edge having limited choices to rectify the already passed ordeal. Throughout the whole life, Clint Eastwood had no stains of having participated in drug dealing. He doesn't seem to have committed a notable offense throughout his life. However, in his film "The mule," he acts like an old man drug courier working for a cunning folk by trying to stay in Infront of the law. This creates a self-retrospection movie of romantic and resonant air of reflection. Being an aged man and having acted many films earlier, by pretending The mule, he appears to put an end to his cinematography life and reopening a new chapter in his life.
In the film, Clint Eastwood acts Earl Stone, one of the Peoria agriculturists who eventually faces garden and house closure due to lack of finance, which finally leaves him with no choice than to become a courier for a drug cartel. The film reflects a similar case of the ranging story which happened in 2014 published in the New York Times. The action journey starts in 2005 when Earl jibes hiss property having three Hispanic men employees prepare Oscar's horticulture within a small farm.
At this period, Earl comes wearing a straw hat and seersucker, behaving like a Peoria star, and wins a prize at the banquet. At the same time, it happens that his daughter was getting married. Hiss's late realization of the mistakes makes him realize that he already screwed up his role as a father. Iris, her daughter, is told by Dianne Wiest, his ex-wife, that his father was always obsessed with work that he could not get time for his family.
At this moment, through the central movie line, everyone seems to miss the implication of Eastwood in such a movie aspect. Alison Eastwood acts Iris's role in the film. This results in a symbolic resonant act filled with emotional family reflection.
Close to 2017, Earl becomes unconcerned about the growing online supplies, which lead to losing his garden and house to foreclosure. The business he has been doing for quite long grows to outcompete by online suppliers. Eventually, he decides to pay his employees and packs his belonging in the old truck tries to show up in Iris Pre-wedding. Despite having not talked to his daughter since 2005, he keeps reneging to pay for his granddaughter's wedding expenses. As he exits the area, he is added a business card offering a deal to make a ransom amount to cater for his promise. Earl's personality of being a product of con-artist capabilities is demonstrated when he asks whether the offer was only for driving.
Eastwood achieves the ultimate ability to play around with Earls's Temperament and age. Continually switching between behaviors, being flustered, blinkered, naive, and out of touch. Sometimes gets embarrassed, fumbles, and gets into an unpredictable state in which the issues of age make him odd. He acts as a controversial role in which his actions and word cannot be accepted in young individuals. However, the movie implication has a sharp delivery of events since it He knowingly acts corny.
By acting naive, he eventually joins crime in his new life direction with an innocent face. He is claimed to be a Korean War veteran; however, despite his combat experience, he appears to be cautious. He doesn't behave as owning a gun or even carrying it along. When he encounters armed officers, he does not play a superhero against them. He has a unique measure to deal with his enemies on the way to be either creating distraction or acting bravely.
Earl uses his newly acquired wealth to mend his house and life. He uses the wealth to pay for his bills, reacquire his home, and also buying new vehicles such as the pickup truck he bought. He also mends his broken fence with the help he receives from friends and his family. He extends his warm heart to the public by performing multiple charity works. He plays all these aspects of life through the use of the money he acquires from the financial components such as banks and insurance companies. He differentiates from ordinary people by the way he handles financial needs when it comes to needless obstacles and pleasures that different people encourage. By doing so, he shows the political instances where the government prioritizes specific resources according to how much they are needed.
He shows how he is different from the current changes in the movie industry in both aspects involving personal life and corporation with others. He portrays how the internet, together with devices supporting social media features are busy destroying the future about Eastwood visions. Different institutions are ravaged by these factors also, and it destroys the American psyche. All of these are described in the film in the order human labor is currently oriented right from the tire shop to the cartel headquarters. People are unable and lazy to change the flat tires of their vehicles. He shows the difference between such kinds of people who have to depend on other people for their services to be delivered exclusively.
Earl faces many terrifying things in his life while he exists as an independent drug mule. He spectates murder scenarios once the new cartel starts being operational. Such factors can be relayed to the correctness of saying that he sees soul-killing while he struggles to be independent. Along with such threats, threats from police become inevitable in his course of work. The law enforcers pose threats from a diverse point of view. The cops from the locality, together with the international D.E.A officers, are seen to raise the risk to Earl and how he made his livelihood. Such threats were not targeted to him directly since they were mostly aimed at the new drug cartel, who was careless in every aspect of their business conduction.
Multiple police officers threaten his livelihood. They included agent Bates, agent Trevino, and Laurence Fishbourne. Bradley Cooper, also known as agent Bates was the head of the operation targeting the drug cartel. Michael Pena, also called agent Trevino was agent Bate's partner and was put in the action because he was aware of the locality very well; he knew how the cartel conducted business. Lawrence Fishbourne was the head of the agency that was handed the operation by the government. A lot of pressure was directed to him to ensure that the police operation was conducted in the shortest time possible and that all channels concerning the inspection conducted were carried out through his mandate.
Most movies, as observed, bring out different features such as law enforcement, among others. The function is mostly organized, and strictness is emphasized as it carries a lot of weight on how it is implemented. In most movies, American life circling guns and how they are acquired illegally is depicted. In the film, such features are portrayed as the vision of allowing firearms and booming of criminals together with how the police handle the cartels with the guns is sharply outlined. The film shows a negative stand on the acquisition of such firearms in real life as it shows that most criminal activities and worst-case scenarios would be achieved if such were allowed.
The film handles the effects of racism in multiple scenes. There is a scene where a traffic police officer appears bitter on a chosen few, based on racial lines. The actor Earl also uses random racial names such as "beaner" and "Negro." he uses beaner to refer to Mexicans and the negro to refer to the black African-Americans. At first, the names are incendiary, and with time they change to be funny even though they are applied along the movie to portray the theme of racism and its harmfulness.
It is evident from the film that all aspects of modern life are handled to an extent. Such involves the difficulties associated with current relationships as Earl fails to mend his fractured family relationship. "The Mule" describes and shows the melancholy of the actor after trying to put his hustle in front of his family, and it also undermines how nostalgia is portrayed in the film.
Eastwood describes the societal view absorbed by many people where a man was supposed to work hard to provide bread to his family while the woman was expected to stay at home and do the house chores. The actor was presented in a way that showed that men were also suffering from the burden dragged from traditional gendered views. Although women feel the responsibility to a greater extent, men are affected severely by the distance that exists between them and their families when they start to work. It is vital to note that Earl was a father to a daughter lest a son would have a different role in the film.
The mule is described to the maximum, and the actor portrays many political incidences. Earl describes his failures and strengths he used to transform his scars to success. It is a film where the actor plans for his path by preceding the old beliefs.
Clint Eastwood playing a significant role in the making and directing of the film "The mule," demonstrates a pure form of racism. They are portraying the Mexican life as being filled with harmful and moral decadency practicing all kinds of illegal activities. Therefore, the political meaning of the film is to expose the racist nature of the time. Since, in the movie, there is no legal influence, only the whites are involved; the video can be used to portray pure racism.
Cite this page
Essay Sample on Political Meaning - The Mule. (2023, Apr 24). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.net/essays/political-meaning-the-mule
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Example on Feminist Art in China and Britain
- Free Essay: Audience Assessment of Columbia Accident Investigation Board
- Essay Example on the High Cost of Low Morale
- Essay Sample: Affidavit for Search Warrant
- Free Essay on Public Speaking: What I Know, Assume, or Imagine
- Free Essay Providing Solutions to the Problem of Overspending Money
- Reflection Paper Sample on Nursing Managerial Leadership and Analysis
Popular categories